Contact A Counsellor

counsellor button


Research on Depression in the Workplace.

For more information please click here



email subscribers list

To subscribe to SADAG's newsletter, click here

To view previous newsletters - click here


Mental Health Matters Journal for Psychiatrists & GP's

MHM Volume 7 Issue1 small

Click here for more info


journalists crew making newspaper

If you are a journalist writing a story contact Cassey or Kayla or Tracy on 011 234 4837


cope with cancer book

Literacy is a luxury that many of us take for granted. That is why SADAG created SPEAKING BOOKS and revolutionized the way healthcare information is delivered to low literacy communities.

The customizable 16-page book, read by local celebrity audio recordings, ensures that vital health and social messages can be seen, heard, read and understood by everyone across the world.

We started with books on Teen Suicide prevention , HIV, AIDS and Depression, Understanding Mental Health and have developed over 100+ titles, such as TB, Malaria, Polio, Vaccines for over 45 countries.

suicide speaking book

CAPE TOWN — The South African Society of Psychiatrists (Sasop) has reacted cautiously to a study showing that new-generation antidepressants such as Prozac do not work for all but the most severely depressed patients.

The study, led by a University of Hull team and published yesterday in the Public Library of Science, analysed all the data submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration for the registration of four of the most widely prescribed antidepressants — fluoxitine (Prozac), venlafaxine (Effexor), nefazodone (Serzone) and paroxetine (Seroxat/Paxil).

According to Sasop, the prevalence of depression in SA is about 10%, and about a fifth of medical scheme members aged between 30 and 40 take antidepressants in any one year. All the drugs but nefazodone are widely used in SA.

The study has implications for patients and also raises questions about the extent to which the pharmaceutical industry withholds data on its drugs.

The researchers used the US Freedom of Information Act to obtain the data from 47 clinical trials, including previously unpublished figures. They found the drugs had no clinical effect for mildly or moderately depressed patients, as the improvement in depression among the patients getting the trial drug was no better than among those getting a dummy pill.

Benefits were seen in only a small group of patients who were the most extremely depressed to start out with — and this benefit seemed to be because depressed patients did not respond as well to a placebo, rather than because they responded better to the drugs being tested.

Sasop’s past president Eugene Allers said patients and doctors should not be alarmed by the study. “It doesn’t say much more than we already know,” he said. “International guidelines say psychotherapy is the preferred method of treatment for mild or moderate depression, and for more severe depression, psychotherapy combined with medication. Clinically, we definitely see a benefit from the drugs,” he said.
Jonathan Broomberg, head of strategy for SA’s biggest medical scheme Discovery Health, said the funder had no immediate plans to alter its policies on providing antidepressants .

“We will not make any changes until there has been thorough consultation with the psychiatry profession,” he said. About 0,2% of Discovery’s 2-million members were taking drugs included in the study, he said.


Our Sponsors

Our Partners